What an annulment is
Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), Part 2: a person convicted or sentenced by the Local Court in their absence may apply under s 4 to have the conviction or sentence annulled. The application must be made within 2 years. If granted, the matter is dealt with afresh, as though the original determination had not been made.
An annulment is not an appeal. An appeal says the court got it wrong; an annulment says the hearing should not have proceeded without you in the first place. If the application succeeds, the conviction or sentence is set aside entirely and the case starts again — you enter your plea, the evidence is heard, and the matter is decided with you there to answer it.
That distinction matters practically. A conviction recorded in your absence often rests on the prosecution's version alone, unchallenged. Annulment restores what the original hearing skipped: your side.
How this happens to people
Convictions in absence are rarely the product of defiance. The recurring patterns are mundane:
- The court attendance notice never arrived — posted to an old address, left with a former housemate, or simply lost.
- You moved house after being charged, and every later notice followed the address on the charge papers.
- Illness, accident or misadventure kept you from court on the day, and the matter proceeded without you.
- A fine matter escalated quietly — an unpaid penalty notice became a court matter you never knew existed.
- You missed a sentencing date and a warrant issued — discovered months later at a traffic stop or an airport.
Whatever the path, the legal position on discovery is the same: the conviction stands, and everything attached to it runs, until the court annuls it. Fines accrue enforcement costs, licence disqualifications operate, and warrants remain live.
The grounds — what the Local Court must be satisfied of
The court may annul a conviction or sentence made in your absence where it is satisfied of one of three things:
- You were not aware of the proceedings until they were completed;
- You were hindered from taking action — by accident, illness, misadventure or other cause; or
- It is otherwise in the interests of justice to annul the decision.
These applications are decided on evidence, not assertion. An affidavit explaining precisely how the notice was missed, supporting documents — tenancy records, medical evidence, postal history — and a coherent account of what you did once you found out all carry weight. So does speed: a person who applies the week they discover the conviction presents very differently from one who sat on the knowledge for a year. The third ground, the interests of justice, also lets the court look at the underlying matter — including whether you had something real to say in your defence.
The 2-year window
An annulment application must be made within 2 years of the conviction or sentence. That is far more generous than the 28-day appeal window, and deliberately so — by definition, people in this situation discover the problem late. But the window is measured from the court's decision, not from your discovery of it. A conviction found at month 23 leaves weeks, not years, to act.
What to do when you discover a conviction in your absence
The sequence matters more than most people expect.
- Get the record first. Find out exactly what was decided, when, in which court, and what orders were made — including any warrant.
- Do not pay the fine as a reflex. Payment does not undo the conviction, and the conviction is usually the real problem — for employment, insurance and travel.
- If there is a warrant, deal with it on your terms. Warrants do not lapse. Attending court voluntarily, with representation and an application prepared, is consistently better than being arrested at a roadside stop.
- Move quickly. The application is stronger, and the practical damage smaller, the sooner it is made after discovery.
If the 2-year window has closed, an annulment is no longer available — but other avenues may be, depending on the matter, and that assessment should be made by someone who does this work. Every matter turns on its own facts.
How Lenz Legal approaches annulment applications
These are compact, evidence-led applications, and they reward careful preparation: the court record obtained and read, the affidavit drafted to address the statutory grounds squarely, the supporting documents assembled, and any warrant managed before the listing rather than at it. Where the annulment is granted, the matter is then heard afresh — and the same disciplined defence work applies to the rehearing as to any other charge.
If you have just discovered a conviction, a disqualification or a warrant you knew nothing about, call before doing anything else. The first conversation will usually tell you exactly where you stand.
Annulments — your questions answered
I was convicted without knowing about my court date — what can I do?
Apply to the Local Court under section 4 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act to have the conviction or sentence annulled. If granted, the decision is set aside and the matter is heard afresh with you present. The application must be made within 2 years, so act as soon as you discover it.
How long do I have to apply?
Two years from the date of the conviction or sentence — measured from the court's decision, not from when you found out. Until the annulment is granted, the conviction and everything attached to it (fines, disqualifications, warrants) remains in force.
What grounds do I need?
The court must be satisfied that you were not aware of the proceedings until they were over, that you were hindered from attending by accident, illness, misadventure or another cause, or that annulment is otherwise in the interests of justice. Each ground should be supported by evidence — affidavits and documents, not just an explanation from the bar table.
There is a warrant for my arrest — should I just wait and see?
No. Warrants do not expire, and they tend to be executed at the worst moments. The managed course is to get advice, prepare the application, and come before the court voluntarily with representation — consistently a better position than being brought in under arrest.