Lenz LegalCriminal Defence
Assaults & Violent Offences

Affray Charges in NSW

Affray is charged when violence — or the threat of it — would have frightened a bystander. It reaches further than most people expect, and it is treated more seriously than most people expect. If you have been charged in Sydney, the decisions you make in the first days matter most. Dean Lenz is an Accredited Specialist in Criminal Law with more than twenty years defending these matters.

The offence
Affray — using or threatening unlawful violence
The law
Section 93C, Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Maximum penalty
10 years (District Court) · 2 years (Local Court)
First step
Get advice before any police interview

What is affray?

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 93C: a person who uses or threatens unlawful violence towards another, where the conduct would cause a person of reasonable firmness present at the scene to fear for their personal safety.

Affray is the charge police reach for when violence breaks out in a group setting — a fight outside a pub, a brawl at a party, a confrontation that spills into the street. What makes it different from assault is that it is not really about the person you fought with. It is about the public character of the violence: whether a hypothetical bystander of reasonable firmness, watching what happened, would have feared for their own safety.

Three things about affray routinely surprise people charged with it. No one needs to have been hurt — threats of violence are enough, although words alone are not. No bystander needs to have actually been present — the test is hypothetical. And it can be committed on private property, not only in public. A fight in a backyard can found an affray charge just as a fight on George Street can.

What the police must prove

To convict you of affray, the prosecution must prove each of these elements beyond reasonable doubt:

  • You used or threatened unlawful violence towards another person — and a threat cannot be made by words alone;
  • Your conduct would have caused a person of reasonable firmness present at the scene to fear for their personal safety; and
  • You intended to use or threaten violence, or were aware your conduct may be violent or threaten violence.

Where several people are involved, it is the conduct of those acting together, taken as a whole, that is assessed — but your individual role still matters enormously to both liability and sentence. The peripheral participant and the instigator are not in the same position, and the defence work often lies in establishing exactly where in that spectrum you sit.

Penalties and how courts sentence affray

Affray carries a maximum of 10 years' imprisonment when dealt with on indictment in the District Court. Most affray charges are dealt with in the Local Court, where the maximum is 2 years. The available outcomes span the full range: from a non-conviction order under section 10, through fines, Community Correction Orders and Intensive Correction Orders, to full-time custody for serious group violence.

What moves a sentence up or down: the degree and duration of the violence, whether weapons or glassing were involved, your role relative to others, injuries caused, your record, and the strength of the subjective case — references, rehabilitation, and the account of how that night came to happen. Courts treat alcohol-fuelled group violence as a deterrence priority; a properly prepared plea, in the right cases, still regularly produces non-custodial outcomes.

The evidence police rely on — and where it falls short

Affray prosecutions are built from CCTV and mobile-phone footage, witness accounts from bystanders and security staff, and increasingly from social media. That evidence is often weaker than it first appears. Footage shows fragments, not context — it rarely shows who started it, and almost never shows what was said. Identification in a melee is notoriously unreliable: dark venues, moving crowds, similar clothing. Witness accounts of group violence diverge wildly on sequence and roles.

The defence task is forensic: matching every frame and every account against the elements, isolating your conduct from the group's, and testing whether what remains actually proves you used or threatened unlawful violence — or simply proves you were there. Presence at a fight is not affray.

Defences to affray

  • Self-defence — a complete defence. If you acted to protect yourself or another and your response was reasonable in the circumstances as you perceived them, the prosecution must disprove it beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Words alone — a threat cannot be constituted by words by themselves; conduct is required.
  • The reasonable-firmness threshold — minor scuffles do not necessarily clear the bar of causing a person of reasonable firmness to fear for their safety.
  • Identification — the prosecution must prove it was you, and melee identification evidence is fertile ground for doubt.
  • Duress or necessity — in the rarer cases where they arise on the facts.

Which of these has real prospects is a judgement call on the evidence — made properly only after the brief is examined. It is also the conversation to have before deciding how to plead, not after.

How Lenz Legal approaches affray charges

Dean Lenz has defended affray matters for more than twenty years — from first-offence incidents outside licensed venues to large group prosecutions. The approach is the same senior, methodical one each time: obtain and examine the full brief early, test the footage and identification evidence against the elements, and have the negotiation with the prosecution before positions harden — because affray charges, more than most, can often be resolved by negotiation to a lesser charge where the evidence of role is thin.

Where a defended hearing is the right course, it is prepared as one from the beginning. Where the evidence is strong, the work turns to the plea: timing, references, rehabilitation, and a subjective case that gives the court a real basis for the least serious available outcome.

If you have been charged with affray — or police have asked you to come in for an interview — get advice first. The interview is frequently where affray cases are lost.

Affray — your questions answered

Is affray serious for a first offence?

Yes. The maximum is 10 years in the District Court, or 2 years in the Local Court, and courts treat group violence seriously even for first offenders. But a first offence, handled early and well, also gives the defence its widest range of options — including negotiated outcomes and, in appropriate cases, orders without conviction.

What is the difference between affray and common assault?

Common assault concerns violence or threats directed at a specific person. Affray concerns the public dimension of the violence — whether a bystander of reasonable firmness would have feared for their own safety. You can be charged with affray where no one was struck, and where the incident happened on private property.

Can an affray charge be dropped or negotiated?

Sometimes. Depending on the evidence, affray may be withdrawn or negotiated to a less serious charge — common assault, or offensive conduct — particularly where your role was peripheral. That negotiation should be approached early, with senior advice, before positions harden.

Will I go to jail for affray in NSW?

Not necessarily. Outcomes range from non-conviction orders through fines and community-based orders to imprisonment. The result turns on the seriousness of the violence, your role, your record, and the quality of the case put for you. Every matter turns on its own facts.

I was defending myself — can I still be charged?

You can be charged, but self-defence is a complete defence to affray where it applies — and once raised on the evidence, the prosecution must disprove it beyond reasonable doubt. Whether your response was reasonable is exactly the question to assess with a solicitor before any police interview.